“I can tell you as chairman of the (Senate Budget Committee), we have a room full of lawyers working as hard as we can to make the case to the parliamentarian that, in fact, raising the minimum wage will have significant budget implications and, in fact, should be consistent with reconciliation rules,” Sanders, a Vermont independent who caucuses with Democrats, told CNN’s Jake Tapper on “State of the Union.”
Cedric Richmond, a senior adviser to Biden, told MSNBC on Sunday that the administration still supports a $15 dollar minimum wage and that it backs Sanders’ efforts to keep that in the President’s plan.
Richmond said Biden’s comment on the increase not surviving “was merely his prediction of what he thought the Senate would do,” adding: “Sanders has assembled a team to make a very compelling argument that it should stay in the bill under the Senate rules.”
Sanders also emphasized the importance of passing a Covid relief package as soon as possible, while not backing down on Democratic priorities, including the federal minimum wage hike and a higher income threshold for individuals receiving stimulus checks.
“Before we get to what the vice president is going to do, I’ve got to get through the parliamentarian and then I’ve got to get 50 votes in support of raising that minimum wage to $15 an hour. I am working as hard as I can to make that happen,” he said.
Pressed by Tapper on whether he would be willing to decrease the dollar amount of the hike in order to ensure he has all the Democratic votes he needs, including that of Sen. Joe Manchin, a moderate member of the party from West Virginia, Sanders noted that he does not think a $15 federal minimum wage is a “radical idea.” He added that he believes “at the end of the day” Democrats understand the provision needs to pass.
Sanders also doubled down on his belief that Democrats should not lower the eligibility threshold for direct payments to the level that Republicans want. He said he agrees with the lawmakers saying they don’t want wealthy individuals to receive the proposed $1,400 payments, saying “what we need to do is have a strong cliff so it doesn’t kind of spill over to people making $300,000.”
However, he called the desire by some to set the threshold for payments at individuals making $50,000 or less “absurd,” noting he disagrees with that position for policy-related and political reasons.