“The president is not doing cable news interviews. Tweets from his account are limited and, when they come, unimaginably conventional. The public comments are largely scripted. Biden has opted for fewer sit down interviews with mainstream outlets and reporters.”
So, the way to show that you are “really in charge” is to, among other things, stop sending “limited” tweets from your account that are “unimaginably conventional”?
But his not doing so is quite clearly the result of a strategic decision. Biden wants to be — in virtually every way — the anti-Donald Trump. That very much includes the way — and when and how often — he communicates with the American public. (Sidebar: Biden is also not the best at thinking on his feet amid press conferences and interviews, so his lack of a constant TV or social media presence is also likely aimed at protecting him from major flubs.)
You can absolutely criticize Biden for not being as available to the media or as transparent in his decision-making as reporters always hope politicians are.
But to suggest, as Cornyn did, that Biden’s lack of aggressive tweeting — as well as paucity of media interviews — is somehow a sign that he isn’t really “in charge” (whatever the heck that means) is way out of bounds.
It also suggests that Trump, who was (as even his allies would acknowledge) a whirling dervish of chaos and contradiction during his time in the White House, was somehow in command because, uh, he tweeted a lot of crazy stuff?
The Point: There’s plenty for Republicans to go after Biden on. That he doesn’t tweet and act like Trump in office ain’t one of them.