UPDATE (6/23/2020): Bill Cosby, who was sentenced to 3 to 10 years in prison for sexual assault back in 2018, will now be able to appeal two issues in his conviction. E! News has obtained the court documents confirming Pennsylvania’s Supreme Court ruling.
Per the docs, the first issue involves, “Where allegations of uncharged misconduct involving sexual contact with five women (and a de facto sixth) and the use of Quaaludes were admitted at trial through the women’s live testimony and Petitioner’s civil deposition testimony despite: (a) being unduly remote in time in that the allegations were more than fifteen years old and, in some instances, dated back to the 1970s; (b) lacking any striking similarities or close factual nexus to the conduct for which Petitioner was on trial; (c) being unduly prejudicial; (d) being not actually probative of the crimes for which Petitioner was on trial; and (e) constituting nothing but improper propensity evidence, did the Panel err in affirming the admission of this evidence.”
While the second issue sates, “Where: (a) the Montgomery County District Attorney (“MCDA”) agreed that Petitioner would not be prosecuted in order to force Petitioner’s testimony at a deposition in Complainant’s civil action; (b) the MCDA’s Office issued a formal public statement reflecting that agreement; and (c) Petitioner reasonably relied upon those oral and written statements by providing deposition testimony in the civil action, thus forfeiting his constitutional right against self-incrimination, did the Panel err in affirming the trial court’s decision to allow not only the prosecution of Petitioner but the admission of Petitioner’s civil deposition testimony?”
Following the ruling, Andrew V. Wyatt, a spokesperson for Cosby, told E! News, “We’re extremely thankful to the State Supreme Court of Pennsylvania for agreeing to review Mr. Cosby’s appeal. America and the world is witnessing the 23rd day of protests regarding the abuse and murder of Black people, not just at the hands of corrupt police officers; but these extremely vital and important protests are exposing the corruption that lies within the criminal justice system (District Attorneys & Judges). As we have all stated, the false conviction of Bill Cosby is so much bigger than him — it’s about the destruction of ALL Black people and people of color in America. We’re extremely thankful to our attorneys (Brain Perry, Jennifer Bonjean & Barbara Zemlock) for their tenacious efforts in fighting for the vindication of Mr. Cosby.”
UPDATE: Bill Cosby is staying put in prison. Though the actor’s legal team sought to overturn his conviction back in October 2018, a Pennsylvania court officially denied his bid on Tuesday and affirmed his conviction for three counts of aggravated indecent assault.
According to NBC News, his lawyers’ main argument was that Cosby’s five accusers and their testimonies were “strikingly different” to that of Andrea Constand. However, the state’s Superior Court ultimately ruled, among other things, that Judge Steven O’Neill was correct in letting everyone share their accounts.
“There were multiple prior sexual assaults, not merely one, and all of those prior assaults evidenced the same, signature pattern of misconduct,” the appeals court said.
“When are we, the people of the United States of America, going to end the acceptance of overall corruptions? I can assure you that our personal battle against clear, racist, incestuous vindictiveness, within the Pennsylvania criminal justice systems, is not over,” Bill’s husband Camille Cosby later said in a statement. “Reform is a soft word; the action word, ‘purging,’ is what needs to be done.”
It’s been less than two weeks since Bill Cosby was sentenced to three to 10 years in prison for sexual assault. Now, the 81-year-old actor is trying to avoid time behind bars.
According to NBC News, Cosby’s lawyers have asked a Pennsylvania court to overturn his conviction, arguing there were flaws in Cosby’s case. Per the news outlet, the legal team claimed Judge Steven O’Neill was mistaken to label Cosby a sexually violent predator. They reportedly alleged the judge improperly factored in trial testimonies from other accusers. In addition, the defense reportedly challenged the state’s sex offender laws and claimed an audio recording of a 2005 conversation between Cosby and the mother of accuser Andrea Constand, which was played for jurors, was not authentic.